GrapeFACE Q5. Number of sites?

5) In the case of a possible grapeFACE facility, do you think it would be worthwhile undertaking the experiments in more than one site, taking into consideration that this would represent a potential doubling in cost and that FACE would need to be run for at least 5 years?


1 Comment

  1. Everard Edwards said

    I think the timescale would really have to be an absolute minimum
    of three years and really for it to actually be worthwhile it should
    be a minimum of five.

RSS feed for comments on this post

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: